Here is a postive post charles smith
Everyone is talking politics
People are saying they are republican
People are saying they are democrat
People are saying they are voting third party
People who are Ron Paul people
and some are even calling for revolution
Here is a psycho analysis of those people
Republicans: Unless you make over 250,000 there is no reason for you to vote republican, the republicans have no platform except for lowering taxes for rich people at a time when the nation needs tax money the most.
The Republican is pretty much a psychological choice. You can't argue with them. They are sad, have a low self-esteem, and are afraid of being alone, while feeling very alone.
It is impossible to argue with them, don't.
Democrats: the democratic party is for people who want to vote and aren't overwhelmed with psychological problems. You can be in a union, black, pro-abortion, a college student, etc and vote democrat.
The democratic doesn't really help, but it doesn't hurt you.
In terms of a world with limitless oil in a context that doesn't exist anymore, they weren't that bad. Now they are dead weight.
Third Party people: They think everything has become bullshit, and hate the two parties so bad, they don't care which one gets into office. They still believe in democracy and that America can be saved.
Ron Paul People: Ron Paul people know that something is horribly wrong, Ron Paul is the only person in the media that is offering another path. His path is based off a world with endless cheap oil. But people do not know that.
The third party people and the ron paul people I do not mind, they might be wrong or inaccurate. But they are open to change, open to new ideas, and being open as opposed to closed is preferable at a time like this.
Revolution people: There are revolution people now, I've heard them on the radio, on the internet, and got to listen to one in a computer lab at school. The revolution people quote Thomas Jefferson, and talk about America, and spout out all kinds of cliches. Their ideas on revolution are also based off of a world with endless cheap fossil fuels. And they have no idea what to replace the current system with.
And they seem to have no idea that to have a revolution, people must get killed.
The 1st step in establishing a revolution, is who must be killed.
They don't know who must be killed and it doesn't even occur to them.
Someone might say that I mention revolution on this blog, but I do not say, "lets have revolution." I say, "There will be one if this and this happens."
Those are two different concepts.
Or maybe it should be said like this: A lot of pro-revolution people want mcdonalds and everybody having cars without owners.
But you can't have those things without owners.